Author: larry
Date: Mon Dec  3 15:55:10 2007
New Revision: 14470

Modified:
   doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
   doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod

Log:
Mention that Int assumes 2's complement semantics when viewed via bitops.


Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==============================================================================
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod        (original)
+++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod        Mon Dec  3 15:55:10 2007
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 
   Maintainer: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: 10 Aug 2004
-  Last Modified: 26 Sep 2007
+  Last Modified: 3 Dec 2007
   Number: 2
-  Version: 119
+  Version: 120
 
 This document summarizes Apocalypse 2, which covers small-scale
 lexical items and typological issues.  (These Synopses also contain
@@ -616,6 +616,10 @@
 PerlĀ 6 intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its
 system of type declarations.  C<Int> automatically supports promotion
 to arbitrary precision, as well as holding C<Inf> and C<NaN> values.
+Note that C<Int> assumes 2's complement arithmetic, so C<+^1 == -2>
+is guaranteed.  (Native C<int> operations need not support this on
+machines that are not natively 2's complement.  You must convert to
+and from C<Int> to do portable bitops on such ancient hardware.)
 
 (C<Num> may support arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic, but
 is not required to unless we can do so portably and efficiently.  C<Num>

Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==============================================================================
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod        (original)
+++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod        Mon Dec  3 15:55:10 2007
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@
 
 would allow any identifier (including any identifier containing
 "moose" as a substring) as long as the identifier as a whole is not
-equal to "moose". (Note the anchors, which attach submatch to the
+equal to "moose". (Note the anchors, which attach the submatch to the
 beginning and end of the identifier as if that were the entire match.)
 When used as part of a longer match, for clarity it might be good to
 use extra brackets:

Reply via email to