On Mar 11, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Ron Blaschke wrote:
It ties pointers to INTVALs, which I guess it shouldn't.
As I read the mail, it seems like the only problem we have is in casting the pointer to an int to find its truthiness. I'd say use the !!(x) and be done with it. The PARROT_ASSERT_POINTER() idea gives me the willies because of checking for hardcoded magic values.
-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
