On Monday 21 April 2008 13:44:44 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:38:52PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
> Thanks again. I was misreading from comments in stack_push, which > say that it pushes things onto the "generic stack" when in reality > it seems to use whatever stack is passed into it. To be fair, it's not even a stack. It's a graph that's usually acyclical. If it were a stack, I wouldn't have had to add the refcounting to see when we can free chunks. -- c
