On Thursday 24 April 2008 12:08:57 Andy Dougherty wrote: > Oops. It won't work because I missed a level of indirection. > > > - return STACK_DATAP(new_chunk); > > That used to return &(new_chunk->u.data) > > > + return new_chunk->u.stdata; > > And this returns new_chunk->u.stdata instead. > > Oops. I can only say I was fooled by the function signatures that these > functions returned 'void *', when they actually return 'void **'.
That one fooled me when I was working on it too. > I'll try to fix that. I apologize in advance if I wasted anyone's time > trying this out. (I still think my basic premise is right -- we can avoid > pointer cast warnings and problems if we declare more explicitly what we > wish to do.) I agree. I'm looking forward to a new patch. -- c
