On Wed Oct 24 13:52:33 2007, pcoch wrote: > In t/src/ro.t there is the todo item: > > # XXX: should this work? > > and the related pir code: > > # three = 4 # should fail -- is that what we want > > The question is: is the behaviour encapsulated in the test actually what we > want?
This test is in t/pmc/ro.t, not t/src/ro.t The question can be summed up as: when marking a container PMC as readonly, should that make all the PMCs that are contained readonly as well? If so, we need to make that work (and add a test for at least a hash-style one as well), and if not, we can reverse the sense of the todo test and enable it. -- Will "Coke" Coleda
