On Saturday 12 July 2008 21:52:52 Christoph Otto via RT wrote: > The test now passes, although I'll leave this ticket open until someone > can confirm that it still does the right thing. > > The new version of t/codingstd/c_macro_args.t as of r29372 has several > special cases: stringification, concatenation, use of args as types when > pointers to that type are cast/created, function argument > instrumentation, args as function names and macros which recursively use > macros which use concatenation. This last case is used mostly in > includes/parrot/pobj.h for testing, setting and clearing flags. These > macros could be rewritten, but there are enough of them that it's easier > just to tell the test that these macros are ok. > > I would appreciate comments on whether this is the right approach.
+1 for modifying the test, not the macros. -- c
