Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 23:35 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:23PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > 21:51 < pmichaud> so unicode:"«" and unicode:"\xab" would produce > > exactly the same result. > > 21:51 < pmichaud> even down to being the same .pbc output. > > 21:51 < allison> pmichaud: exactly > > > > The former is a valid char in an UTF8/iso-8859-1 encoded source file and > > only there, while the latter is a single invalid UTF8 char part. How > > would you interpret unicode:"\xab\x65" then? > > I'd want \xab and \x65 to represent two codepoints, not encoding bytes > for a single codepoint.
And that shall be the distinguished from: U+AB65: ꭥ by what? > Pm leo
