On Mon Sep 08 01:18:37 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Christoph Otto via RT wrote: > > > > Is this something we want to go ahead with or should this ticket be > > rejected? > > I've had it on my hiveminder todo list for over a month now. The problem > is, it's not only a matter of annoying fiddly bookkeeping work now, it's > also annoying fiddly bookkeeping work eternally into the future. And, it > doesn't actually solve the original problem of knowing when a PDD was > significantly updated, because whoever edited the PDD might have just > forgotten to update the manual date stamp. > > So, ticket rejected. The only authoritative information on revisions to > a PDD is the commit logs. > > Allison >
Rejected it is.
