On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote: > oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and > forgot to address the item here. C<perl6 --doc> replaces p5's > C<perldoc> (that's the latest idea from damian, although it seems not > to be published yet).
Ah, I get it! What about perldoc's special modes? Will these go in ++DOC ... ++/DOC sections? > the most likely short names, C<< < -d -o -c > >> are all taken by > either p5 or p6 command-line. i don't want to use C<-d>, because that > has to do with the debugger in p5, so makes it harder for p6 to catch > accidental usage. C<--doc> probably warrants a short name, since it > will be called frequently--i hope, reducing irc traffic :) but i > haven't decided on a good name yet. i'm open to suggestions. Don't have any yet. Will let my subconcious ruminate on it. -'f
