On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:55:37AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Qua, 2009-04-01 às 05:41 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
> > ...nor would I expect it to. I'm just wondering if (@_, %_) _are_
> > still part of a placeholder-generated signature. In short, is there a
> > way to access a slurpy array or hash in a block that uses placeholder
> > parameters?
>
> I'd guess not, but I think it's a plain design decision.
@_ and %_ are part of a placeholder-generated signature if
they're mentioned in the block. From S06:154:
Note also that if the sub's block contains placeholder variables
(such as C<$^foo> or C<$:bar>), those are considered to be formal
parameters already, so in that case C<@_> or C<%_> fill the role of
sopping up unmatched arguments. That is, if those containers are
explicitly mentioned within the body, they are added as slurpy
parameters. [...]
Pm
