masak (>):
> $ cat /tmp/test
> class M {
> has M @.ms is rw;
> method s($i=0) {
> $i ~ "[{ map { "{$_.s($i + 1)}" }, self.ms }]"
> }
> }
>
> my $m = M.new;
> my $m2 = M.new;
> $m2.ms = M.new;
> $m.ms = M.new, $m2, M.new;
> say $m.s;
>
> $ perl6 /tmp/test
> 0[1[] 2[3[]] 4[]]
>
> # expected output:
> # 0[1[] 1[2[]] 1[]]
>
> <masak> jnthn: did you fix my bug yet?
> <jnthn> masak: no.
> <jnthn> ENEEDMORECOFFEE
> <jnthn> I looked at it, and then ran to the coffee machine. :-)
> <masak> lol
> * moritz_ also found it a bit hard to follow :-)
> <masak> I think by golfing it I actually made it harder to follow. :/
> <masak> when it was about indentation, it was immediate that it was wrong.
> <moritz_> or if you gave them names (<a b c d e>) and print that along
> with the number
> <masak> the structure looks like this: Ma[Mb, Mc[Md], Me]
> <masak> now, Mb and Me should be printed with the same indentation/number.
> <jnthn> masak: ugh
> <masak> but they aren't.
> <jnthn> masak: Yes, I see the bug now.
> * masak submits rakudobug
> <jnthn> I agree it's wrong.
<masak> rakudo: sub f(@a, $i=0) { $i ~ "[{map { f($_, $i + 1) }, @a}]" }; say
f([[], [[]], []])
<p6eval> rakudo 7347ec: 0[1[] 2[3[]] 4[]]
* masak adds that to #70469
<pmichaud> masak: I suspect that's related to dispatch/binder changes, but
that's just a
guess.
<masak> pmichaud: same here.
<jnthn> Me too now I see it as a sub example.
<jnthn> masak: Default param to blame?
<masak> jnthn: I'll check.
<masak> rakudo: sub f(@a, $i) { $i ~ "[{map { f($_, $i + 1) }, @a}]" }; say
f([[], [[]], []], 0)
<p6eval> rakudo 7347ec: 0[1[] 2[3[]] 4[]]
<masak> jnthn: no.
<jnthn> masak: Aww.
<moritz_> masak: dammit. I was just about to put it into
S06-signature/defaults.t
<jnthn> lol
<masak> :)
<pmichaud> looks to me as though a new lexpad isn't being created somehow.
<jnthn> Yeah, the problem is in there somehow.
<moritz_> masak: and now I realize it's the wrong place, and I have no clue
where to put it
<masak> moritz_: sorry :D
