Brian S. Julin (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by  "Brian S. Julin" 
> # Please include the string:  [perl #65556]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
> # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=65556 >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> According to S03, when used in a functional manner, precedence 
> for prefix ops should behave as if the operator were a function.
> 
> S03: "not($x) + 1         # means (not $x) + 1"
> 
> Currently the examples in S03 produce different results than specced.
> 
> See IRC discussion here:
> 
> http://irclog.perlgeek.de/text.pl?channel=perl6;date=2009-05-11

The test now passes, so I guess the problem is now solved.

Reply via email to