On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that having a standard, minimal API for this defined in core as a >> Date role would be ideal. > > > Agreed. In fact, I'd like to see DateTime be defined explicitly as a > superset (subrole) of Date, with a method for extracting just the Date > portion built in to DateTime. > Er, I meant that to read "(subrole?)". Not sure that inheritance is the way to go here, but I do think that logically a DateTime should be built on top of a Date, rather than having Date be a whittled-down DateTime with too-different an API. -- Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com>
