2010/4/13 Aaron Sherman <a...@ajs.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Larry Wall <la...@wall.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 07:24:37PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> : > 1. do all implementations of Perl6 generate the same sequence, given
>> the
>> : > same initial seed.
>> :
>> : I don't think they should. If you want that, use confuse a RNG with a
>> : sequence generator that it is not.
>>
>> While I agree that the default should be non-reproducable, the
>> approach taken in Perl 5 is nice to the extent that if you *do*
>> seed the built-in RNG with a consistent value, you get a reproducable
>> result.  And reproducable trees of random sequences can be generated
>> by controlling the seeds of each node in the tree.
>>
>
> I think that what this conversation is boiling down to is: an RNG is just a
> role that wraps an iterator factory and provides some passable defaults, to
> be implemented as the default class or classes for Perl's core. That's fine,
> but the idea of non-reproducible defaults worries me. If, by this, you mean
> that whatever seed is provided to "srand" is to be aggregated with another
> source (e.g. XORed with output from the system's entropy source), then I
> would love to hear from someone who has experience with the last 10 years of
> PRNG work who thinks that's not opening us up to some sort of strange
> edge-case risk.
>
> PRNGs are often misrepresented as frivolous, but as I'm sure you know from
> your work at JPL, high quality random sequences are much-prized, and any
> language that starts off with some poor assumptions will ultimately pay for
> it.
>
> Some good reading for recent work:
>
> http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/SFMT/

MT19937 was ported on Parrot/PIR (currently hosted on
http://github.com/fperrad/parrot-MT19937).
But currently, Parrot lacks an entropy source.

François

> http://eprint.iacr.org/2006/086
> http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/oldtcp/tcpseq.html
> http://www.avatar.se/python/crng/index.html
>
> --
> Aaron Sherman
> Email or GTalk: a...@ajs.com
> http://www.ajs.com/~ajs
>

Reply via email to