# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #75446] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75446 >
<masak> I've found a case where a line number is one-off. should I nopaste it? <jnthn> masak: please <masak> I don't think it's the fault of the new backtraces thing, to be honest. <masak> more like a result of parsing or something. <jnthn> Well, the other thing is that we don't have as many :node($/)s in Actions.pm as we maybe should. <jnthn> So could very well be some wins to be had by some careful extra scattering of those. <masak> http://gist.github.com/418990 (inlined here) $ cat one-off sub bar { pfff } bar $ perl6 one-off Could not find sub &pfff in 'bar' at line 1:one-off in main program body at line 6:one-off <jnthn> masak: curious <jnthn> masak: Does it get it right if you do pfff() ? <jnthn> as in, add parens? * masak tries * jnthn had a test very much like that which got it right <masak> no. <jnthn> ok <masak> maybe it sees the statement as starting on line 1, or something? <jnthn> That's very possible. <jnthn> I just thought that it'd been getting it right. <jnthn> (I had a very similar test case...) * jnthn plays spot the difference <jnthn> masak: hmm, I agree it seems to be one off there. * masak submits rakudobug <jnthn> masak: Think it may be a Parrot fix. <jnthn> masak: Thing is, the annotations in the PIR look correct. <jnthn> Trying my first guess at a patch now. <masak> I'll include that in the Rakudobug. :)
