This is getting more and more off topic, but if you want some lojban pasers, start at http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Dictionaries,+Glossers+and+parsers
-y On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Carl Mäsak <cma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jason (>): >> No specific tool is best suited for natural language processing. There was >> apparently a time in which everyone thought that a formal grammar could >> clearly define any natural language, but I don't think anyone succeeded at >> creating a complete formal grammar for any language other than something >> like Esperanto. > > Even Esperanto is about on the same level of complexity as your > regular Indo-European language. Sure, the word-formation is more > regular, but the freedom in creating sentences with non-obvious > antecedents and all manner of ambiguity, is just as large as in any > national language. > > Now, had you said Lojban, I'd have believed you. :) > > // Carl >
