On Mon Oct 10 16:35:27 2011, coke wrote: > On Tue Jul 27 18:42:29 2010, coke wrote: > > On Tue Jun 16 08:57:58 2009, masak wrote: > > > <masak> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c > > > <p6eval> rakudo ba09b2: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in getprop() [...] > > > * masak submits rakudobug > > > <pmichaud> masak: ::c is lexically scoped. > > > <masak> pmichaud: meaning it can't be seen? > > > <pmichaud> outside of the block, no. > > > <masak> still, a Null PMC access is never right. > > > <pmichaud> true. > > > > 21:42 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c > > 21:42 <+p6eval> rakudo 7f5c22: OUTPUT«Cannot modify readonly value in > > '&infix:<=>' at line 1 in main program body at line > > 22:/tmp/xfWzETH8wO» > > > > Changed again: > > 19:35 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c > 19:35 <+p6eval> rakudo 38907e: OUTPUT«Cannot assign to a non- container in > <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in block <anon> at > /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1» > > Is this now closable?
Yes, since the Null PMC Access is gone. Resolving ticket.