On Wed Nov 14 05:24:29 2012, masak wrote:
> coke (>):
> > I was unable to test this:
> >
> > #RT #115506
> > eval_lives_ok
> > "macro pathological { AST.new }; pathological();",
> > "macro returning AST.new doesn't blow up";
> >
> > fails with:
> >
> > prove -v -e t/fudgeandrun t/spec/S06-macros/errors.tt/spec/S06-
> > macros/errors.t ..
> > 1..1
> > not ok 1 - macro returning AST.new doesn't blow up
> > # Error: Missing block
> > # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1
>
> Double-quoted "" strings interpolate {} blocks. So I don't think the
> first argument to eval_lives_ok means what you think it means. I've done
> the same thinko myself a number of times.
*facepalm*
Created new test file, S06-macros/errors.t, rakudo now runs that file.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
