# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian # Please include the string: [perl #115740] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # <URL: https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115740 >
Rakudo 2012.10 bbkr_ r: =pod p6eval rakudo c82d10: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Preceding context expects a term, but found infix = insteadat /tmp/eqe30h6iti:1» bbkr_ std: =pod p6eval std 04216b1: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 40m» bbkr_ which one is incorrect? should bare =pod (without closing =end tag) be allowed? masak I don't think STD does any Pod parsing. bbkr_ then it's LTA rakudo message, right? masak possibly. * bbkr_ reports masak I'd like to hear what tadzik has to say about it. masak the above should count as "abbreviated block" syntax, I think. as far as I see, it shouldn't need an ending delimiter, because abbreviated blocks auto-close.