On May 28, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Carl Mäsak (via RT) <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" > # Please include the string: [perl #118227] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=118227 > > > > <masak> r: class A {}; my %h{A} = A.new => 2; my %h2{A} = %h >>+>> 40; say %h2 > <camelia> rakudo 25a0b3: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for > parameter 'key'; expected A but got Str instead [...]» > <masak> how reasonable are my expectations above? I expect that to work. > <masak> (i.e. produce '(A.new() => 42).hash' as output) > <pmichaud> masak: I suspect that hypering doesn't know about typed hash keys > <masak> I suspect so too. > <pmichaud> since it was written before we had them :) > <masak> but... it's not unreasonable to have that work, is it? :) > <pmichaud> on its face it doesn't strike me as unreasonable > * masak submits rakudobug > <pmichaud> the devil may be in the details here, though > <pmichaud> I consider it a valid rakudobug for the moment, yes.
Feels like this in essence is the same as .clone not being able to clone a typed hash. Liz
