On Mon Oct 10 16:35:27 2011, coke wrote:
> On Tue Jul 27 18:42:29 2010, coke wrote:
> > On Tue Jun 16 08:57:58 2009, masak wrote:
> > > <masak> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say A::c
> > > <p6eval> rakudo ba09b2: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in getprop() [...]
> > > * masak submits rakudobug
> > > <pmichaud> masak: ::c is lexically scoped.
> > > <masak> pmichaud: meaning it can't be seen?
> > > <pmichaud> outside of the block, no.
> > > <masak> still, a Null PMC access is never right.
> > > <pmichaud> true.
> >
> > 21:42 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say
A::c
> > 21:42 <+p6eval> rakudo 7f5c22: OUTPUT«Cannot modify readonly value
in
> > '&infix:<=>' at line 1 in main program body at
line
> > 22:/tmp/xfWzETH8wO»
> >
>
> Changed again:
>
> 19:35 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { enum B <c d e>; ::c = B::c }; say
A::c
> 19:35 <+p6eval> rakudo 38907e: OUTPUT«Cannot assign to a non-
container in
> <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in block <anon> at
> /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1 in <anon> at /tmp/Hw7cFnRkA1:1»
>
> Is this now closable?
Yes, since the Null PMC Access is gone. Resolving ticket.