On Tue Jul 15 05:41:54 2014, coke wrote: > On Wed Jul 09 07:09:04 2014, coke wrote: > > We tracked the initial spec switch to "EVAL", and left "eval" around > > to allow folks to switch. > > > > Now that a suitable amount of time has passed, we should remove "eval" > > and associated spec tests, and probably add a spec test that insures > > that it dies_ok. > > > > lizmat++ removed this recently.
I don't think we need a test for something that isn't in the spec. Closing ticket. -- Will "Coke" Coleda
