in grammar actions it's valid to create methods like:
name:sym<variant>($/) { ... }
so I guess '$object.name:k:' args could work but :k<v>, would be tricky
because it would be hard to differentiate between invoking '$object.name:k<v>:
args' and '$object.name:sym<variant>: args'.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 PM Alex Jakimenko <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org>
wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko
> # Please include the string: [perl #127539]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127539 >
>
>
> Code:
> my @h = <1 1 2 1 1>;
> say @h.grep:k: 1
>
> Result:
> (1 1 1 1)
>
>
> I expected to see (0 1 3 4) which is the result of a very similar code
> snippet: my @h = <1 1 2 1 1>; say @h.grep: 1, :k
> However, it is totally fine to me if such code is supposed to do something
> else (e.g adverb the method name itself instead of passing named arguments,
> whatever that means).
>
> See IRC log for jnthn comments:
> http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-02-13#i_12036804
>
