But should those 2 forms behave differently?
20:40 <SmokeMachine> m: multi infix:<||>(42, 42) {"OK"}; say infix:<||>(42,
42); say 42 || 42
20:40 <camelia> rakudo-moar 8f3476: OUTPUT«OK42»
Enviado do meu iPhone
> Em 11 de jan de 2017, às 20:20, [email protected] via RT
> <[email protected]> escreveu:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:05 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:23:18 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>>> If I write another || operator it will continue to use the original
>>> version.
>>>
>>> https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-01-10#i_13895823
>>> <https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-01-10#i_13895823>
>>
>> To save other readers sifting through the chan log... Even an only sub
>> doesn't take root:
>>
>> <Zoffix> m: sub infix:<||> ($, $) {"hi"}; say 42 || 55
>> <camelia> rakudo-moar 9a11ea: OUTPUT«42»
>>
>> This applies to &&, and, or, and I'd guess any shortcurcuiting
>> operator.
>
> These are special compiler forms that receive special code-gen, due to their
> shortcircuiting nature, and so do not result in sub calls. Thus there's no
> sub to override.
>
