> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Zoffix Znet via RT <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: >> See this... > > See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were > fallout: > <timotimo> raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the commit if > there's ecosystem fallout, which you just demonstrated > > https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-08-17#i_15031866 > > >> Personally, I don't mind rereverting it afterwards for inclusion in >> 2017.09 > > To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise to > users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and IMO the > 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that promise.
Hear hear!
