Obviously, that fixes the immediate problem, but is there any clue as
to the reason for the extraordinary difference in performance? Where's
it happening?

I can see it taking longer for the parser to look up the characters,
but shouldn't the original translation have reduced that to a common
form (essential what's been done here), before the execution?

If this question reveals a total ignorance of the internal processes,
please forgive it, and keep the reply simple and brief.

Reply via email to