See also https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125816 (same bisectable
result)

On 2017-10-02 17:12:02, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW, fix bisected (not precisely, but maybe this helps anyway):
> * bisect log: https://gist.github.com/5049c109fce53fa78ff969a44ba66366
> * (2015-08-27)
>
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/23b3d29da6ffd8e016ea6da6c34858b95339af34
>
> https://github.com/perl6/nqp/compare/2015.07.2-29-
> ga9a4c0b...2015.07.2-35-g02910ff
> https://github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/compare/2015.07-59-
> g64fba68...2015.07-68-g3240047
>
> On 2017-10-01 23:31:00, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This now simply complains about unboxing a large integer. Not sure
> > when this
> > changed, but testneeded.
> >
> > On 2015-08-14 22:21:17, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Code:
> > > say <a b c d
> > > e> .roll(-9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999).perl;
> > >
> > > Result:
> > > it hangs
> > >
> > > Code:
> > > say <a b c d
> > > e> .roll(-
> > > e>
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999).perl;
> > >
> > > Result:
> > > ("b",)
> > >
> > >
> > > On the other hand:
> > > say <a b c d
> > > e>
> >
>
.roll(99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999).perl;
> > >
> > > Result:
> > > ()

Reply via email to