I'll close it. Suggested use of ｢or｣ is rather clear, and learning about it takes exactly the same amount of effort the second optional argument will take.
If anybody has to say something about it please feel free to. We can reopen the ticket if there's new information on why that particular feature is needed. Until then, closed. On 2017-10-02 05:18:52, tbrowder wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 18:16:34 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 17:23 Zoffix Znet via RT > > <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:10:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > ... > > > My vote on this feature is a most definite -1. I see no reason to > > > over-engineer a core module to support some fringe usecase. > > > The tests routines return the test status, so you can write that > > > particular usecase as: > > > > > > ok check-name($meta, :$relaxed-name), "name has a hyphen rather than > > > '::'" > > > or diag "\nTo use hyphen in name, pass :relaxed-name to meta- > > > ok\n"; > > > > > > Which comes out as: > > > > > > not ok 1 - name has a hyphen rather than '::' > > > # Failed test 'name has a hyphen rather than '::'' > > > # at /tmp/z.p6 line 4 > > > # > > > # To use hyphen in name, pass :relaxed-name to meta-ok > > > # > > > > Perfect! I knew you would show the way—just need to show that kind of > > example in the docs... > > Please feel free to close this issue.
