Hmmm…. I guess this one does… good point! :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:57, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
> <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>
> Does it mean that this now needs tests?
>
> On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT <perl6-bugs-
>>> follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
>>>> The "solution", IMO, would not be to make your quoted example work
>>>> (by
>>>> adding further special cases to the return types of the setty
>>>> operators or otherwise), but rather to make the following variation
>>>> of
>>>> it work:
>>>>
>>>> my %days is SetHash = Date.today … Date.new: '2014-04-02';
>>>>
>>>> %days ∖= %days.grep: *.key.day-of-week > 5;
>>>>
>>>> %days{Date.today}:delete;
>>>>
>>>> ...and then promote %-sigiled SetHash variables as the recommended
>>>> way
>>>> to store SetHash'es.
>>>>
>>>> It should be possible to make this last example work by implementing
>>>> `method STORE` for type SetHash, right?
>>>>
>>>> (That it currently doesn't, may well be an oversight rather than a
>>>> design choice.)
>>
>> Commit b6a4d5b555520451c5c8a made this possible:
>>
>> my %d is SetHash = Date.today .. Date.new("2017-11-30”);
>> %d .= grep: *.key.day-of-week > 5;
>> dd %d;
>> ================================
>>
> SetHash.new(Date.new(2017,11,5),Date.new(2017,11,12),Date.new(2017,11,26),Date.new(2017,11,4),Date.new(2017,11,19),Date.new(2017,11,11),Date.new(2017,11,18),Date.new(2017,11,25))
