Just to clarify, the last snippet now produces 0 0 0 0, which is indeed
correct.
There are tests for this change in general, but possibly not for that
particular case. Can we get it covered just in case?
｢testneeded｣
On 2018-02-06 05:51:23, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 02:56:47 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This is how a state variable normally works:
> >
> > ➜ for ^2 { for ^2 { say (state $a)++ } }
> > 0
> > 1
> > 0
> > 1
> >
> > But when it is declared inside a {} interpolation in a string, it
> > misbehaves:
> >
> > ➜ for ^2 { for ^2 { say "{ (state $a)++ }" } }
> > 0
> > 1
> > 2
> > 3
> >
> > It's as if the state variable attaches to the scope of the outer loop
> > or mainline, instead of the inner loop like it should.
>
> Looks as if the code behaves as expected according to jnthn. See
> https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2018-02-06#i_15783359
>
> Rejecting issue.
