On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:23:51 +0000, Dave Whipp wrote:
> I agree that CVS makes it difficult to change things later (I assume you
> don't want to risk Subversion in its current state). However, I would
> suggest that you hold off creating the elaborate structure until we need
> it. Bucket loads of empty subdirectories benefit no one. And CVS has no
> problem adding things later.
Yes, I did not make that clear.
> Could you elaborate on you need to change the test harness to "find all
> of the tests": are you proposing something more complex than "find all
> *.t files (recursively)"?
No, that's just as complex as we need. The current test harness says:
my @tests = @ARGV ? @ARGV : grep !m{^t/parser/}, glob( "t/*/*.t" );
runtests(@tests);
It assumes a one-level hierarchy. I'd pull out File::Find and remove that
limitation, if there were more levels.
-- c
