I've updated the literals tests to fully account for the radix notation;
and I've also updated the tests to use the new radix#(number):(number)
notation. Let me know if anyone finds any errors.
Find them at:
http://jryan.perlmonk.org/images/literals.tar.gz
Michael Lazzaro wrote:
--- Numeric Literals ---
decimal notation:
123 # int 123
0123 # int 123
123.0 # num 123.0
-123 # int -123
0_1.2_3 # ok
_01.23 # wrong
01.23_ # wrong
01_._23 # wrong
1__2 # wrong
exponential notation:
-1.23e4 # num
-1.23E4 # num (identical)
1.23_e_4 # wrong
bin/oct/hex notation:
0b0110 # bin
0c0123 # oct
0x00ff # hex
0x00fF # hex, == 0x00ff
0x00FF # hex, == 0x00ff
-0xff # ok
-0x00ff # ok
0xf_f # ok
0x_ff # ok
explicit radix:
(radix 2-32)
20:1gj # base 20
20:1GJ # base 20 (identical)
20:1.G.J # base 20 (identical)
20:1_G_J # base 20 (identical)
20:1.16.19 # base 20 (identical)
20:1_16_19 # NOT identical; == 20:11619
20:1.1_6.19 # WRONG: dotted form may not have underlines
-20:1GJ # base 20 (negative)
-20:1.16.19 # base 20 (negative)
62:zZ # base 62 (?)
62:z.Z # base 62 (identical?)
62:z_Z # base 62 (identical?)
62:Zz # base 62 (not identical?)
(radix 33-RADIX_MAX)
256:0.253.254.255 # base 256
256:0_253_254_255 # base 256
MikeL
