Re: Numeric literals, take 3

[Bryan C. Warnock]

On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:47, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:

> Yes, but the first digit is 0.  Or, more accurately, 0 * 16**2.

Hmmph.  Some accuracy.  0 * 16**1

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
bwarnock@(gtemail.net|raba.com)