On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:02:31PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I'm really thinking that the lexer, parser, and tokenizer can't be anywhere > near as separate as we'd like. I think we're going to end up with a rather > odd mutant beast. Hopefully one that's understandable by reasonably sane > people... This would *honestly* be my preference; I think it would be far easier to write and understand than anything else. So long as it's nicely re-entrant we should be fine. My only worry is, how do we reconcile this with the idea of Perl having an easily modifiable grammar and being a good environment for little-language stuff? -- ?warning: write might change good version of `/dev/null' - plan9 has a bad day
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Steve Fink
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Steve Fink
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens