At 05:07 AM 11/30/00 +0000, David Grove wrote:
>Dan: In any PDD generated from this group, we really need to define for
>the "semantically challenged" the terms that are used within it:

No, I don't think that's appropriate.

Any new terminology specific to the PDD should be defined, but that's it. 
Perl terms not specific to the PDD should be defined elsewhere (either in 
an RFC or PDD). For everything else, there's the bibliograpy.

If you (and this is the generic you here) aren't up to speed on the basics 
of the field (parser design, optimizer design, interpreter design, 
whatever) it's best to get up to speed first.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to