At 05:07 AM 11/30/00 +0000, David Grove wrote: >Dan: In any PDD generated from this group, we really need to define for >the "semantically challenged" the terms that are used within it: No, I don't think that's appropriate. Any new terminology specific to the PDD should be defined, but that's it. Perl terms not specific to the PDD should be defined elsewhere (either in an RFC or PDD). For everything else, there's the bibliograpy. If you (and this is the generic you here) aren't up to speed on the basics of the field (parser design, optimizer design, interpreter design, whatever) it's best to get up to speed first. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Andy Dougherty
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Buddha Buck
- Perl apprenticing (was Re: Back... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl apprenticing (was Re: ... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Backtracking through the so... David Grove
- the mutant beast (was Re: Backt... Dan Sugalski
- the mutant beast (was Re: Backt... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: the mutant beast (was Re: B... Simon Cozens
- Re: the mutant beast (was Re: B... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: the mutant beast (was Re: B... Dan Sugalski
- APIs will make JVM porting easi... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: APIs will make JVM porting ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the so... Steve Fink
- Re: Backtracking through the source Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the source raptor
- Re: Backtracking through the source David Grove