On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 12:16:33AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> From a language perspective, I have a scheme to allow us to yank all the
> cruft (sockets, shm, messages, localtime...) out into separate libraries,
> yet pull them in on demand without needing a use.
Yep, yep. That's unquestionably the Right Thing. IMO. Would you like me to
do an RFC, or would you want more time working out the Plan?
--
For true believers, LORD would be K\textsc{nuth} in TeX, and
L\textsc{amport} in LaTeX. Atheists prefer \phantom{LORD}. Agnostics
may need to use the ifthen package.
- Chris Boyd, comp.text.tex
- Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on language (was ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on langu... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on l... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on l... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interfa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: dat... Graham Barr
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Ken Fox
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: dat... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re:... Tim Bunce
- Re: C# (.NET) has no inter... Joshua N Pritikin
