Dan Sugalski wrote: > > there is a nice paper "The Structure and Performance > > of Interpreters" by Romer, Lee, et al. that compares Java, Perl and Tcl. > > URL? Google had a bunch of references when I searched on "structure performance interpreters", but none of them had the full text. (The ACM library is also a really nice place to look for papers, but it's not free anymore.) Anyways, this is probably a gross violation of copyright, WIPO, the DMCA and innumerable other state and federal laws... but you can find it at <http://www.msen.com/~fox/InterpreterS+P.ps.gz>. - Ken
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters Dan Sugalski
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters John Tobey
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters Ken Fox
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters John Tobey
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interfa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: interpreter performance Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Randy J. Ray
- opcodes (was Re: Stuff in core (wa... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Papers and reference works Ken Fox
- Papers and reference works Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Larry Wall
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on language (... Piers Cawley