are API definitions implementation details?

[David L. Nicol]

Dan Sugalski wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> >
> > this list is _only_ concerned with implementation details.
> 
> Well, assuming you consider API definitions implementation details. :)
> 
>                                         Dan


I thought from the example RFC that perl6-internals was the only list
there was, or that the librarian would assign to a list (as happens
at IETF) if I suggested wrong list.



-- 
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                               On hold for tech support since 1995