Dan wrote: >At 09:12 AM 8/25/00 -0400, Stephen P. Potter wrote: >> As you say, 200 lines isn't much. But combine that with the IPC, the >>environment, the system, etc it all adds up. > >Not to much, though. We've been down this road for perl 5. You'd be >surprised at how little code gets removed if you yank most of the functions >under discussion. (They're generally trivial wrappers around library calls, >with very little code involved) so is all this concern about the size of perl due to the hope of making perl "embeddable"? with 128 meg of ram and a 40 gig drive, I'll assume its not due to system limitations. Greg London
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric fun... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core GregLondon
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... John Porter