Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >At 02:25 PM 8/24/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >>But >> >>($foo, $baz, @bar) = (1,(2,3),4) # $foo = 1 $baz=2, @bar=(3,4) >> >>Actually, looking at it like that makes it an ugly situation. The 'new' >>expectation would be to have it become >> # $foo=1 $baz=2 @bar=(4) > >Wouldn't that be $baz = 3, since the middle list would be taken in scalar >context? Which has sanely become the length of the list rather than last element. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function return... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function r... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large functi... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large functi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large fu... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large functi... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large fu... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel