Steve Fink wrote:
>
> "cond" for conditional?
I was thinking along that line, too. But coopting "conditional" in any way
is probably an ungood idea.
Probly "trans" is good; it has multiple useful mnemonic values: transactional,
transfer, transparent...
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
- RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6 Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variables fo... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variable... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled vari... dLux
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... dLux
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... dLux
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... dLux
