Steven W McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> DS> Some things we can guarantee to be atomic.
>
>> This is going to be tricky. A list of atomic guarentees by perl will be
>> needed.
>
>>From RFC 178
>
>...we have to decide which operations are [atomic]. As a starting
>point, we can take all the operators documented in C<perlop.pod> and
>all the functions documented in C<perlfunc.pod> as [atomic].
Presumably _ONLY_ in the absence of tie and overload:
use overload '.' => 'do_add';
sub do_add
{
open(my $socket = "http://www. ...")
...
}
>
>
>- SWM
--
Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Thre... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads(m... raptor
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Thre... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Glenn King
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
