In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "TH" == Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TH> Well if we allow value changes in the middle of iterating either
> TH> keys or values then that is a user visible behaviour change which
> TH> potentially needs to be hideable in p52p6 translation.
>
> I don't follow. Currently changing a value is perfectly permissible and
> is visible immediately.
So it does. It hadn't clicked with me that when values is expanded
the scalars pushed on the stack are the same ones as are in the hash
so changes are visible.
> What is currently undefined is deleting or adding a key during the
> iteration.
Indeed. I will update my RFC in light of this...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
...It was a book to kill time for those who liked it better dead.
