On 5 Oct 2000, at 15:06, Dan Sugalski wrote: [about his Darned Big Pile of books] > I should actually RFC it--we could use a "recommended reading" RFC. Sounds good -- I'd welcome such a list. It's be a replacement for the very short perlbook and the list in perlfaq3. And quite a lot of good stuff has come out since then. Hm, and its status as an RFC would encourage others to submit books you may have missed. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I appreciate copies of replies to my messages to Perl6 lists.
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Hav... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Hav... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have Wel... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Hav... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should... Dan Sugalski
- Perl recommended reading list Philip Newton
- Perl recommended reading list Philip Newton
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Piers Cawley