On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 01:18:39PM -0400, Ken Fox wrote: > The other down-side is that we'd be doing a whole lot of custom work designed > just for parsing Perl instead of creating something more general and powerful > that can be used for other problems as well. For example, I'd imagine the PDL > folks would much rather extend a recursive-descent parser with back-tracking > than an LR(k) monstrosity. Not that I know anything about how to write a parser. But anecdotal evidence from all the syntax highlighting editors etc. is that perl is the hardest thing to parse. Hence if perl6 contains a generic parser powerful enough to parse perl (if this can be done), to me this would suggest that it would allow a lot of other people to use it to rapidly implement parsers for just about anything else. Nicholas Clark
- Re: Larry's ALS talk Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl (was Re... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl (w... Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Per... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... John Porter
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Ken Fox
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Ken Fox
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Per... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl (w... Dan Sugalski