Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On 18 Dec 00, at 15:21, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > >> There needs to be a hierachy of _repertoires_ such that: >> >> ASCII is subset of Native is subset of wchar_t is subset of UNICODE. > >But we can't even rely on that. I can imagine a couple of Native >encodings around that fiddle with ASCII Then it isn't ASCII, it is ISO-646 or whatever. -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: String representation Philip Newton
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Nicholas Clark
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Kai Henningsen
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Philip Newton
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Nicholas Clark
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nicholas Clark
