Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Apropos safe signals, isn't it possible to let perl6 handle avoiding >zombie processes internally? What use does having to do wait() yourself, >have anyway? Valid point - perl could have a CHLD handler in C and stash away returned status to pass to wait() when it did get called. -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- safe signals (was Re: perl ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Simon Cozens
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: Speaking of signals... nick
- Re: Speaking of signals... Filipe Brandenburger
- Re: Speaking of signals... Damien Neil
- Re: Speaking of signals... Nicholas Clark