At 12:51 AM 2/10/2001 -0200, Branden wrote: >Back to the GC issue, I was wondering something. Okay, I snipped all of this. After reading it, I'm pretty sure it makes no sense at all. Branden, I'd recommend picking up a copy of _Garbage Collection_ and reading it. The ISBN's in the perl reading list. (My copy's in the office or I'd dig it out for you) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Alan Burlison
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Sam Tregar
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Buddha M Buck
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Filipe Brandenburger
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Jan Dubois
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloni... Dan Sugalski