At 12:21 PM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote:
>I believe we should use low bits for tagging. It will make switch
>case much faster.
That's pretty much what I intended. The only reason not to have them as the
low bits is if there's some other field that uses multiple bits, and
optimizing for that field buys us more of a win than the type. Single bit
fields can go anywhere, since I don't think it really matters which bit
gets used there.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types wiz
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types NeonEdge
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Dan Sugalski
