At 03:03 PM 3/8/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote:
>For bigint, we definite need a highly portable implementation.
>People can do platform specific optimization on their own later.
>We should settle the generic implementation first, with proper
>encapsulation.
Care to start one? I'm about to start the big To Do list of stuff.
> > >Do we need to settle on anything - can it vary by platform so that 64 bit
> > >platforms can use 64 bit, in which case the 32/31 choice could even be by
> > >platform (or always 32 if we find it works well)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Buddha Buck
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Simon Cozens
